Gaussian Processes and the Foundations of Change of Measure
Brownian motion as a Gaussian process, the multivariate normal toolkit, and how Radon-Nikodym densities and Girsanov’s theorem re-weight probability to remove drift.
Leads to: Girsanov and the equivalent martingale measure are the mechanism of risk-neutral pricing in Phases 9 and 14.
Learning Objectives
Click a status chip to cycle: Not started → In progress → Studied → Practiced → Needs review → Mastered.
- Define a Gaussian process and show Brownian motion is one with mean 0 and covariance \(\min(s,t)\).
- Use the multivariate normal to compute conditional distributions of Brownian values.
- Define equivalent measures and the Radon-Nikodym derivative as a re-weighting of probability.
- State Girsanov’s theorem and explain how it converts a drifting process into a martingale.
Key Vocabulary
- Gaussian process
- A process all of whose finite-dimensional marginals \((X_{t_1},\dots,X_{t_k})\) are jointly Gaussian; determined by mean and covariance functions.
- Covariance function
- \(c(s,t)=\Cov(X_s,X_t)\); for BM, \(c(s,t)=\min(s,t)\).
- Equivalent measures
- \(\Prob\sim\Q\): they agree on which events have probability zero (mutually absolutely continuous).
- Radon-Nikodym derivative
- The density \(Z=d\Q/d\Prob\ge0\) with \(\E_\Prob[Z]=1\) that re-weights \(\Prob\) into \(\Q\).
- Girsanov’s theorem
- Under a suitable exponential density, \(\tilde B_t=B_t+\theta t\) becomes a Brownian motion (a martingale) under the new measure.
- Equivalent martingale measure
- A measure \(\Q\sim\Prob\) under which discounted prices are martingales; its existence is no-arbitrage.
Intuition & Motivation
Brownian motion as a Gaussian process
This gives a second, equivalent definition of BM and a powerful computational shortcut: to find the joint law of \((B_{t_1},\dots,B_{t_k})\) just assemble the covariance matrix \(\Sigma_{ij}=\min(t_i,t_j)\) and use standard multivariate-normal formulas.
Gaussian conditioning
For jointly normal \((X,Y)\), the conditional law is again normal with a linear mean and a variance reduced by the explained part:
Applied to BM this recovers, e.g., the Brownian bridge: conditioning on both endpoints gives a Gaussian interpolation with a deterministic variance profile.
Change of measure
Re-weighting does not move probability mass onto previously impossible events (that is what equivalence guarantees); it only tilts the likelihoods of the possible ones. The tilt we want is one that removes drift.
The density \(Z_t\) is itself a martingale (an exponential martingale), which is why \(\E_\Prob[Z_t]=1\) for all \(t\) and why \(\Q\) is a genuine probability measure. Girsanov says: to price, find the \(\theta\) that turns the discounted asset’s drift into zero, then compute expectations under \(\Q\).
Interactive: drift removal is a re-weighting, not a shift of outcomes
- Thinking change of measure alters the volatility - Girsanov changes only the drift; \([B]_t=t\) is measure-invariant.
- Using a non-equivalent measure that assigns zero to a positive-probability event; then no Radon-Nikodym density exists.
- Forgetting the \(-\tfrac12\theta^2 t\) correction in the exponential density; without it \(\E_\Prob[Z_t]\ne1\) and \(\Q\) is not a probability.
- Assuming the real-world drift \(\mu\) enters an arbitrage-free price; under \(\Q\) it is replaced by the risk-free rate.
- Any Brownian computation reduces to linear algebra: build \(\Sigma_{ij}=\min(t_i,t_j)\) and apply multivariate-normal formulas.
- The risk-neutral measure is the equivalent martingale measure; its existence is precisely the first fundamental theorem of asset pricing.
- In Monte Carlo, the Radon-Nikodym derivative is the importance-sampling weight - the same math, used to reduce variance.
Knowledge Check
Practical Exercise
Let \((B_t)\) be standard BM. (a) Write the covariance matrix of \((B_1,B_2,B_3)\). (b) Using Gaussian conditioning, find \(\E[B_2\mid B_1=a,B_3=b]\).
(a) With \(\Sigma_{ij}=\min(t_i,t_j)\): \(\Sigma=\begin{pmatrix}1&1&1\\1&2&2\\1&2&3\end{pmatrix}\).
(b) By the Markov/independent-increment structure, conditioning on \(B_1=a\) and \(B_3=b\), the value \(B_2\) is a Brownian bridge between times 1 and 3. The conditional mean interpolates linearly in time: \(\E[B_2\mid B_1=a,B_3=b]=a+\dfrac{2-1}{3-1}(b-a)=a+\tfrac12(b-a)=\tfrac{a+b}{2}.\)
The conditional variance is \(\dfrac{(2-1)(3-2)}{3-1}=\tfrac12\), independent of \(a,b\) - the hallmark of Gaussian conditioning: the mean is linear, the variance is reduced and deterministic.
Lesson Summary
Formula Sheet Additions
- Did I keep volatility fixed under the change of measure?
- Did I check the measures are equivalent (same null sets) before using a density?
- Did I include the \(-\tfrac12\theta^2 t\) term so \(\E_\Prob[Z_t]=1\)?
Retrieval Practice
Close the lesson and answer from memory before checking. This is deliberate, effortful recall - the single highest-yield study action.
A: All finite-dimensional marginals are jointly normal; it is determined by mean 0 and covariance \(\min(s,t)\).
A: They share the same null sets (mutual absolute continuity); the Radon-Nikodym derivative \(Z=d\Q/d\Prob\) re-weights one into the other.
A: It removes (or changes) the drift of a Brownian motion via an exponential-martingale density, while leaving the volatility / quadratic variation unchanged.
Flashcards
Click to flip. These feed the site-wide spaced-repetition queue.
Completion Checklist
- I can explain the core ideas in my own words
- I worked the derivations/examples by hand
- I completed the interactive workbench(es)
- I passed the knowledge check
Source References
This lesson synthesizes and paraphrases concepts from the sources below. No copyrighted text, problem sets, or solutions are reproduced. Return to the originals for full depth.
- Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus (Karatzas & Shreve, 2nd ed., GTM 113) foundational - Ch. 3 - Ch. 3: Gaussian processes, Girsanov’s theorem, change of measure.
- Stochastic Calculus for Finance II (Steven Shreve, 2004) foundational - Ch. 5 - Ch. 5: risk-neutral measure, Girsanov, and the market price of risk.